D9246 Dental Code: First 15 Minutes of Non-IV Sedation

Written by Tabby M. Updated for CDT 2026

D9246 is the CDT code for the first 15-minute increment of moderate sedation delivered by a parenteral route other than an intravenous line, such as an intramuscular or intranasal dose.

D9246 is the anchor of the 2026 non-IV sedation pair, and it is the line habit leaves off. Everything on the claim rests on it: D9247 has nothing to attach to without it, and the billable time on a long case quietly disappears. The other half of the problem sits upstream in the chart. Route only picks which pair of codes you land on. Documented depth is what puts the case in the moderate family to begin with, and a note reading sedated, tolerated well does not establish it.

On this page

What D9246 covers

D9246 reports the first 15-minute increment of moderate sedation, or any part of that block, where the sedative reached the patient parenterally by something other than an IV line. In most practices that means an intramuscular or intranasal dose; submucosal, subcutaneous, and intraosseous administration sit in the same group. Sublingual is the one route the sources argue over, and the question below works through why. D9246 is the anchor of the pair, and D9247 extends it one unit per block after the first.

Two things in the descriptor decide most claims built on it.

  • The clock is anesthesia time. It runs from the point the doctor takes up continuous attendance with the monitoring protocol under way to the point the patient can be handed off to trained staff. It opens before the dose does, which is worth knowing on a code measured in minutes.
  • Any part of the first block is the whole first unit. Eleven minutes of anesthesia time is one D9246 line. There is no partial unit and no second code until the clock passes 15 minutes.

Nitrous does not get its own line. When nitrous runs alongside the injected agent it is folded into the sedation procedure, and D9230 is now reserved for visits where nitrous was the only agent used.

Depth decides the family, route decides the pair

The 2026 descriptors are explicit that the level of anesthesia is established by what the provider documented about the patient’s central nervous system response. Route appears in the nomenclature because CDT codes have carried routes for over twenty years and the procedure is defined by a combination of level, route, and time, but the route does not make a case moderate. Read the chart in that order.

First, is the documented depth moderate? Moderate sedation means the patient responds purposefully to verbal commands, alone or with light tactile stimulation, keeps a patent airway without intervention, and ventilates adequately. If the note describes a patient who could not be roused that way, the case is deep sedation or general anesthesia and moves to D9222 and D9223, or to D9224 and D9225 when the patient reaches general anesthesia with an advanced airway in use throughout. Both of those pairs are new or revised for 2026, and the ADA allows one case to split across D9222/D9223 and D9224/D9225 by increment if the patient transitions.

Then, how was the drug delivered? Route sorts the moderate family into three buckets. A swallowed or rectal dose is enteral and lands on D9244 when a single drug was given at or under the FDA maximum recommended dose, or on D9245 when the protocol went past that. An intravenous dose lands on D9239 and D9243. Everything else parenteral lands here. The full route table, including the deep sedation and general anesthesia codes, is laid out on the D9247 page.

The enteral pair is the odd one out and it is worth naming why. D9244 and D9245 split on drug protocol rather than on elapsed time, so neither is billed by the clock. The moment the route is parenteral, the coding becomes a timekeeping exercise, and that is the shift a practice moving off D9248 has to absorb.

The D9248 habit is what makes this code get skipped

D9248 was one flat line covering every non-IV sedation case, minimal or moderate, regardless of how long the appointment ran. It was deleted effective January 1, 2026 and four codes took its place. For offices that billed sedation that way for years, the muscle memory is the problem: there was never a first increment to report, so nobody reports one now.

That shows up two ways on the claim, and both cost money.

  1. A D9247 line with no D9246 behind it. The add-on has no first unit to attach to and should be expected to reject or deny as an orphan on most plans. At least that one announces itself.
  2. A single D9246 line on a case that ran 50 minutes. This is the quieter loss, because the claim pays. Nothing rejects, nobody calls, and three increments of legitimate time never get billed at all. A denial gets worked; a short-billed claim just closes.

Both come from the same root, which is a workflow that treats sedation as one procedure rather than as a clock. The office that fixes the anesthesia record so start and stop times reach the biller fixes both at once.

Where the carriers land on the first increment

Coverage on this pair is uneven and not intuitive, and because the two codes adjudicate together the D9247 page carries the wider carrier picture. Three facts bear on the first increment directly.

Humana treats it as IV sedation. Its published 2026 code change guidance maps D9246 onto its existing D9239 coverage and D9247 onto its D9243 coverage, so the injected route is adjudicated against the plan’s IV sedation benefit. The same document treats the enteral codes D9244 and D9245 as not covered unless a state mandates it, which means the route the drug took can decide whether the sedation has any benefit behind it at all.

UnitedHealthcare keeps the routes apart. Its General Anesthesia and Conscious Sedation Services policy DCP016.18, effective January 1, 2026, lists all four new codes as applicable but holds non-intravenous sedation to a shorter medical-necessity list: patients with physical, cognitive, or developmental disabilities, and mild to moderate apprehension and anxiety. Worth noticing in the same policy, it defines non-intravenous sedation as medications delivered by oral, intranasal, or transmucosal routes, a broader bucket than the CDT route split. The carrier’s category and the code’s category are not the same shape, so a policy that reads as though it covers your case does not settle which code reports it.

Delta Dental sits at the other end. Its CDT 2026 provider summary lists D9246 and D9247 as not a benefit of most Delta Dental plans and puts the fee on the patient, so the same case that adjudicates against an IV sedation benefit under Humana can be entirely self-pay under a Delta plan. Read the specific plan rather than the carrier’s reputation.

Two fields the anesthesia record has to carry

The anesthesia record carries this code, and the D9247 page sets out the full field list a carrier reads on audit. Two of them decide whether the first increment survives.

  • The route, recorded dose by dose along with the drug and the amount. Route is the only thing separating D9246 from D9239 and from the enteral codes, so a note saying sedation was given has not recorded a route.
  • The anesthetic effect the provider observed. This is the single field the descriptor rests on and the one that establishes moderate rather than minimal or deep. A chart silent on responsiveness leaves no code in the family defensible on review.

A short narrative tying the sedation to the procedure or to a documented patient condition heads off the routine not-medically-necessary denial. Something like intranasal midazolam for a patient with a developmental disability, moderate sedation documented, 14 minutes of continuous attendance for a surgical extraction answers more than a bare code does. Most states also require a permit for moderate sedation and the requirements vary by board, so confirm the provider’s permit covers both the level and the route being billed.

PMS setup that protects the first increment

Every system names these menus differently, whether you are in Open Dental, Dentrix, Eaglesoft, Curve, or Carestream, but two rules do the work on the base code.

  1. Make D9246 the required opening line on any non-IV parenteral case. If your system supports linked or dependent procedures, set D9247 so it cannot post without D9246 on the same date. That one rule kills the orphan-line rejection before it reaches the clearinghouse.
  2. Name the codes in the pick list by depth and route. An entry reading first 15 min, IM or intranasal can be selected without thinking. Four entries that all begin with the word sedation cannot, and D9248 sitting among them will keep getting picked out of habit until it is deactivated.

The rest of the setup, including the quantity trap on the D9247 line and keeping a running list of which carriers have loaded the 2026 sedation codes, is on the D9247 page.

One related line is worth checking on the same case. D9219 covers the doctor’s pre-administration evaluation of the patient for sedation or anesthesia, and the ADA treats it as separately reportable on the same date as the sedation itself. The ADA dental claim form guide covers how the units and the remarks field get filled in.

FAQs

What is D9246 and when did it take effect?
D9246 is new in CDT 2026 and applies to dates of service from January 1, 2026. It covers the opening 15-minute block of moderate sedation, or any fraction of that block, when the sedative was delivered parenterally by something other than an intravenous line. The ADA's January 2026 sedation coding guide puts intramuscular, intranasal, submucosal, subcutaneous, sublingual, and intraosseous doses in that group. Every block after the opening one is D9247. This work used to fall under D9248, a single untimed line that CDT retired effective January 1, 2026.
Can I bill D9246 by itself on a short case?
Yes, and this is the part offices coming off D9248 tend to miss in the other direction. D9246 covers the first 15-minute increment or any portion of one, so a case with 11 minutes of anesthesia time is a single D9246 line with no D9247 at all. D9247 only enters once the clock passes 15 minutes. Do the math off the recorded start and stop times: subtract, and if the result is 15 minutes or less you are done. A 22-minute case is D9246 plus one unit of D9247, and a 42-minute case is D9246 plus two.
What is the difference between D9246 and D9239?
Which line the drug went through, nothing more. D9239 covers the opening increment when the agent was titrated into a vein. D9246 covers it when the agent was injected or sprayed somewhere else, most often into muscle or up the nose. The pair structure, the clock, and the depth of sedation required are identical across both, so the decision is made by finding the route on the anesthesia record rather than by grading how far under the patient went.
How is the sedation time measured for D9246?
Anesthesia time, not chair time. Under the 2026 descriptors the clock starts once the doctor administering the agent has the anesthesia and non-invasive monitoring protocol under way and has taken up continuous attendance. It stops at the point the patient can safely be handed to trained staff for observation and the doctor is free to step away. That start point is earlier than the moment the drug goes in, which matters on a code whose whole subject is elapsed time. Seating, paperwork, and the tail of the recovery period after the handoff are outside the window.
Why do the sources disagree about where a sublingual dose belongs?
The sources do not agree, so treat it as unsettled rather than obvious. The ADA's January 2026 sedation coding guide lists sublingual among the parenteral routes that D9246 and D9247 cover. Pediatric anesthesia guidance from the AAPD and AAP defines the enteral route as absorption through the gastrointestinal tract or the oral mucosa, which puts sublingual with D9244 and D9245 instead, and at least one widely circulated coding-educator summary of the same 2026 update lists the D9246 routes as intramuscular, intranasal, submucosal, subcutaneous, and intraosseous without naming sublingual. If a sublingual case is denied as a route mismatch, ask the plan which family it maps sublingual to before rebilling, and document the route precisely either way.
Why is my D9246 claim rejecting as an invalid code?
On a 2026 date of service that is almost always adoption lag rather than a coding error. Carriers were expected to have CDT 2026 in place for January dates, and the four replacement sedation codes have been among the slower additions to reach live fee schedules and claim edits. Log the call, the date, and who you spoke to, then resubmit once the code is active. Falling back on the deleted D9248 to force the claim through puts a retired code on a current date of service, and carriers are split on whether they will still process it.

Related codes

Need help billing this code?

We handle D9246 claims daily.

If your team is spending time on denials, narratives, or carrier follow-up for this code, we can take it off your plate. We work inside your PMS and post payments the same week.

Book a 30-minute call

CDT codes are maintained by the American Dental Association. This page is an editorial billing guide, not the official ADA code descriptor. Verify current coverage policies with each carrier before submitting claims.